Troubleshoot Evidence Errors in Reading Responses

Troubleshoot Evidence Errors in Reading Responses

Troubleshoot Evidence Errors in Reading Responses

Students' early attempts at evidence-based responses often require some fine-tuning. Specifically, there are three common "evidence errors" that should be addressed within your reading instruction.

#1 The response lacks evidence
Students often provide an answer or opinion or make a claim to a comprehension question but may neglect to back it up with evidence. Providing evidence needs to become a regular facet of all reading classrooms.

Today's literacy standards expect students to always provide two-part responses: 1) What do you think? and 2) Why do you think that? This second component is the textual evidence, and it's a required element in all standardized reading assessment questions.

After correcting this first evidence error, expect a new problem.

Troubleshoot Evidence Errors in Reading Responses for Standardized TestsPeepers help students keep their eyes on the text for evidence-based reading responses

#2 The response is not rooted in the text
Students may attempt to explain their thinking using prior knowledge. This is the difference between talking off the text and talking about the text. Reading responses must include supporting evidence provided by the authors--not the reader's background knowledge.

Reinforce this idea with Finger Puppet Peepers. Students must be able to "eyeball" the detail within the text in order for it to count as textual evidence.

#3 The response provides details, but not evidence
As students return to the text to support their inferences, they sometimes think any detail will work. They begin plucking out miscellaneous words and phrases thinking they are citing evidence. However, often these details are just that--details from the passage.

All evidence is a detail, but not all details are evidence. Choosing random details doesn't provide support for the student's opinion. The details have to be related to the point being made. For additional information on troubleshooting this evidence error, teach students to discern the difference between evidence and details with Evidence Sorts.

Kristina Smekens

Teachers feel empowered and encouraged after working with Kristina. She is an expert at developing practical ways for K-12 teachers to apply research-based literacy strategies.
Learn More About Kristina | Email Kristina

Testimonials about Kristina

“I love all of the aha moments that I have during the presentations--everything makes sense. Brilliant! Your energy and enthusiasm make your audience hang on your every word--Incredible!” Candy Kramer, principal at Sward School, Oak Lawn, IL

“Kristina totally understands how teachers think. I love how she did so much legwork for us by cross-referencing the standards." Cindy Douthett
teacher at Flint Lake Elementary School, Valparaiso, IN

“Kristina is one of the best presenters I have ever seen. She keeps you engaged every second!” Pat Parrish
teacher at New Middletown Elementary School, Corydon, IN

“Kristina is the ‘Rachael Ray’ of education. Using research, history, and relevant examples, she scaffolds the content to launch educators in the new and unexplored—very exciting!” Trace Hinesley
teacher at Riverview Middle School, Huntington, IN

"After 33 years of teaching, I still am drawn back into Kristina's workshops because they are research-based, standards-focused, and very interactive. No matter your years of experience or age of your students you teach, you will glean a lot of great teaching strategies!" Katie Cadle
teacher at Throop Elementary School, Paoli, IN